Glossary

What is interim compensation under Section 143A of the NI Act?

Section 143A, inserted in 2018, lets the trial court order the accused in a cheque bounce case to pay the complainant up to 20% of the cheque amount as interim compensation at the start of the case. It was designed to stop drawers using delay as a strategy.

1,000+
businesses onboarded
₹50 Cr+
invoice value handled
700+
businesses got their money back
60%
of cases settled before court
Short answer

Under Section 143A, when the drawer pleads not guilty in a summary trial or summons case under Section 138, the court may direct the drawer to pay interim compensation to the complainant not exceeding 20% of the cheque amount, within 60 days (extendable by 30 days). The amount is recoverable as a fine if unpaid, is adjusted against the final compensation, and must be repaid with interest if the drawer is acquitted.

How Section 143A works in India

After the complaint is filed and the accused appears and pleads not guilty, the complainant applies for interim compensation. The Supreme Court has held that the power is discretionary, not automatic: the court looks at the prima facie case, the defence raised and the drawer's conduct, and records brief reasons. Once ordered, the money is paid to the complainant directly, not into court. If the drawer does not pay, it is recovered like a fine, including by attachment. At the end, the interim amount is deducted from the final compensation under Section 138 and 357 CrPC, or refunded with interest if the drawer wins.

Why it matters for getting paid

Cheque cases can take years. Section 143A gives the supplier up to a fifth of the money within months and, more importantly, a court order against the drawer early. Together with the Section 148 appeal deposit, it means a drawer who fights to the end still pays as the case proceeds. Many settle rather than face both. Read the entry on Section 138 for the overall process.

How FundRaksha uses it

FundRaksha's advocates file the Section 143A application with the complaint so it can be heard at the first effective hearing, supported by the invoices, ledger and memo. The order often triggers a settlement discussion, which keeps FundRaksha's pre-court settlement rate around 60%. The success fee of 30% applies to amounts actually recovered, including interim compensation.

Worked example (hypothetical)

A Vadodara chemicals supplier files a Section 138 complaint on a ₹10,00,000 cheque. The drawer appears, pleads not guilty and claims the goods were defective, though no complaint was ever recorded. The court orders interim compensation of 20%, ₹2,00,000, within 60 days. The drawer pays it to the supplier. The case is eventually decided in the supplier's favour with compensation of ₹10,00,000 plus ₹1,50,000 for costs and delay; the ₹2,00,000 already paid is deducted, leaving ₹9,50,000 payable. Had the drawer been acquitted, the supplier would have refunded ₹2,00,000 with interest at the bank rate.

Last reviewed: 2026-10-08. Information for Indian businesses; not legal advice.

Free, no obligation

Free consultation and case assessment

मुफ़्त सलाह, कोई शुल्क नहीं

Talk to a FundRaksha recovery expert for free. In one call we assess your unpaid invoices and tell you honestly what can be recovered, how, and in roughly how long. No fee for the call, no obligation, and no upfront cost if you go ahead: our fee is a percentage of what we actually recover.

  • A review of your invoices, purchase orders, delivery proof and the buyer’s replies
  • An honest assessment of recovery chances and the right route: reminders, legal notice, MSME Samadhaan, Section 138 or a civil suit
  • A realistic timeline and the exact cost: nothing upfront, a success fee only on recovery
  • A dedicated advocate assigned within 24 hours if you decide to proceed
Keep these ready
  • The unpaid invoice(s) and payment terms
  • Purchase order, delivery challan, e-way bill or proof of service
  • Messages, emails or letters about the payment
  • For a bounced cheque: the cheque and the bank return memo

No recovery, no fee. Court fees, if any, are borne by the client and told upfront.

FAQ

Questions, answered

No. The Supreme Court has held the court must exercise discretion and give brief reasons, considering the prima facie case and the defence. In clear supply-of-goods cases it is commonly granted.

This page is general information for Indian businesses, not legal advice for your specific case. Laws, rates and procedures change; speak to an advocate before acting. FundRaksha LegalTech Pvt Ltd is a technology company; legal work is carried out by enrolled advocates.